Ripoff Central: 40% markup on iPad 2

April 1st, 2011

This is what Australians are willing to pay, now that the iPad 2 is officially sold out in stores.

Ebay is a different story, however, as the listings for iPad 2 have an average selling price of $1141 (for the 64GB WiFi models), being over 40% increase in the store pricing.

Apple itself is not helping the over-charging done by hopeful eBay sellers, with new stock not being available in Apple stores for around the 3-4 week mark.

Whats a desperate iPad 2-lover to do? Consult eBay and get bidding!

View the full article on Sydney Morning Herald here.


iPad 2 is unveiled

March 4th, 2011

Less than a year after the first iPad was released, the iPad 2 will hit Australian markets on 25 March 2011.

And whats in store in the new models? Well the same price tag for starters, but it is said to be thinner, lighter, faster, and have dual front and back facing cameras.  And the choice of black or white colouring.

Steve Jobs is very confident in his device, saying ‘Everybody’s got a tablet,will it be the year of the copycats?”  He proclaims that Apple has a 90% market share.

That share may be erroded however, by the number of new tablets coming onto the market.  The closest competitor to the iPad is said to the Motorola Xoom.

View the full SMH article here.


National Broadband Network one step closer

February 11th, 2011

SMH reports today that Telstra and the NBN Co have hammered through another part of the national broadband network deal today.

The “key commercial terms” have been announced, so Telstra now has the green light to shut down the copper network and share its infrastructure with the NBN Co.

Now, the Telstra shareholders will need to vote on whether to proceed with the deal, with the vote to take place earlier than July.

Telstra itself will be hoping for a ‘yes’ vote, given that its recently released half year financials showed a 36% profit decline.


Aussie Tech Update: The Man v Microsoft

February 4th, 2011

Well we did promise an update on the interesting story of Ric Richardson, who was appealing a US court decision in favour of Microsoft for a patent infringement. As a positive note for his cause, he has been successful this week in the appeals court in reinstating the original ruling, which ordered Microsoft to pay Uniloc $338 million USD for the infringement.

Richardson is  a well-known inventor, who invented the patent in question which was aimed at software piracy detection, in the 1990s.

Whats next for this man? Sony and McAfee apparently! Watch this space.

View the full article on Sydney Morning Herald here.


More dangers for Internet Explorer users

February 1st, 2011

Microsoft has highlighted a major security flaw affecting the 900 million users of its web browser.

To make sure you are protected, please visit the news story on SMH.com.au here.


Technology automation for Supermarkets – for better or worse?

February 1st, 2011

In the past 6 months I’ve had the opportunity to try automated self-checkout at both Coles and Woolworths.

The machines are relatively easy to figure out. But what I seem to find is a large gap between these two chains with respect to usability and my temptation to throw something at them out of frustration.

Coles had the first self serve checkouts, I used them at Wynyard Station, Sydney to start with. Over time, I found that:

-They were easy to use and intuitive.
-There were no unnecessary steps – once you had finished you could actually insert your cash into the machine and you didn’t have to press anything else to do so.
-There are a few problems sometimes but I think this is part of the learning curve.
-Bags too small at Coles King St.
-Staff are always attentive and quick – they don’t assume that because it’s automated it’s going to always work as intended.

Then they introduce them downstairs at Woolworths Town Hall, where I usually check out.

-Same sort of machines.
-Of the 6-7 there, I’ve only ever seen 3 working.
-It is unclear which ones have just broken, and which ones are okay. Little direction from staff.
-I always see people standing there, unsure what to do.
-I always see people looking like they’re contemplating breaking the machine as it continually throws up errors.
-I always have to have a staff member swipe their card to override a problem. Usually related to the machine detecting an incorrect weight, which is due to the fact it takes so long to fit anything into the tiny bags they provide, or to move the next bag and open a new one (which is a challenge in itself as they are stuck together at the top), that by the time you’ve sorted it the machine thinks you’re shoplifting.
-I always have to press so many buttons to get through – I can’t just enter cash I have to press the “No” to not using my Woolworths rewards points, then press “Cash” it is not intuitive.

Overall, my experiences suggest that Coles has added a new convenient way to speed up the checkout process for people. Whereas Woolworths has aimed to replace people with a computer.

Two companies providing a very similar physical device, but with a very different outcome for customers.

Technology needs to have that extra bit of thought so that it not just new technology but is a useful solution, and there is a very thin line between the two.


Google v Scroogle

January 21st, 2011

Google in Australia has already taken proceedings against other companies allegedly infringing its trademark, such as Groggle (Groggle is now named Drinkle and the proceedings have settled).

Now Google has a new ‘infringer’ in its sites, a family owned company called Scoogle.  The name Scoogle comes from a modification to the family name of Scougal, and sells eyewear ie: nothing to do with Google’s own business.

A source close to Scoogle says that Google is “…just bullying the modified version of the Scoogle family name”.

Google itself hasn’t yet commented – watch this space!

The full Sydney Morning Herald article is here.


Facebook and Twitter help with disaster relief

January 14th, 2011

In a different post from the usual involving Facebook and Twitter, the social media sites have been useful in allowing people who are stranded in flood-stricken areas to connect with relatives and friends.

Facebook was used to post Queensland Premiere Anna Bligh’s updates and messages of hope throughout the crisis.

Twitter is also credited with helping to sort out emergency housing locations and information, and provide updates on police information.

View the full article here.


Online site probes new privacy fears

December 23rd, 2010

SMH reports that the website www.reverseaustralia.com is a directory which links names and phone numbers, to addresses.  It has caused the Australian Communications and Media Authority to investigate whether it constitutes a privacy breach.

The service, created by an Australian man living overseas, not only links to phone numbers which may otherwise be unlisted, but also asks users to login using their Facebook details, which is arguably also using private information.

James (first name given only), the maker of the site, wants to create an i-Phone Ap for this service too.


Optus v Vodafone: the Telco wars

December 17th, 2010

Optus believes that Vodafone Hutchinson is running misleading ads over its new Infinite mobile phone plans, specifically that the qualifications to its plans haven’t been adequately disclosed in its advertising. Infinite plans are touted as an alternative to fixed line rentals, for $45 per month.  So Optus is taking Vodafone to Federal Court over these alleged misleading ads, seeking an interim injunction from these ads being run.

Optus itself has two ongoing cases in the courts whereby the ACCC argues that it is running misleading ads itself.  One is for the ‘unlimited plan’, which the ACCC argues its not what is promised, and another plan is for limits on downloads, which Optus has allegedly not disclosed to customers.

The full article is on SMH here.