Archive for the ‘business’ Category

Damp Streetwear and the reasons to go for online business

Sunday, April 14th, 2013

Damp Streetwear is a retail shop that has recently discovered the power of online business and how it can improve their sales. Damp Streetwear is owned by Matt Dampney, he is the founder of cutting edge clothing brand and also owns a design studio in Australia. Matt Dampney has decided to start the online retailing for the clothing side of his business, this is to increase his sales and reduce the costs of running a business on the street such as shop rental.

Matt says his business used to pay between $20,000-50,000 annually for the cost of shop rental which is very expensive. This was before he found out about the idea of online business, which gave him a substantial opportunity to expand and market his business.

You can read more over at http://www.smh.com.au/small-business/damp-streetwear-the-future-of-retailing-20130403-2h5nf.html

 

Technology automation for Supermarkets – for better or worse?

Tuesday, February 1st, 2011

In the past 6 months I’ve had the opportunity to try automated self-checkout at both Coles and Woolworths.

The machines are relatively easy to figure out. But what I seem to find is a large gap between these two chains with respect to usability and my temptation to throw something at them out of frustration.

Coles had the first self serve checkouts, I used them at Wynyard Station, Sydney to start with. Over time, I found that:

-They were easy to use and intuitive.
-There were no unnecessary steps – once you had finished you could actually insert your cash into the machine and you didn’t have to press anything else to do so.
-There are a few problems sometimes but I think this is part of the learning curve.
-Bags too small at Coles King St.
-Staff are always attentive and quick – they don’t assume that because it’s automated it’s going to always work as intended.

Then they introduce them downstairs at Woolworths Town Hall, where I usually check out.

-Same sort of machines.
-Of the 6-7 there, I’ve only ever seen 3 working.
-It is unclear which ones have just broken, and which ones are okay. Little direction from staff.
-I always see people standing there, unsure what to do.
-I always see people looking like they’re contemplating breaking the machine as it continually throws up errors.
-I always have to have a staff member swipe their card to override a problem. Usually related to the machine detecting an incorrect weight, which is due to the fact it takes so long to fit anything into the tiny bags they provide, or to move the next bag and open a new one (which is a challenge in itself as they are stuck together at the top), that by the time you’ve sorted it the machine thinks you’re shoplifting.
-I always have to press so many buttons to get through – I can’t just enter cash I have to press the “No” to not using my Woolworths rewards points, then press “Cash” it is not intuitive.

Overall, my experiences suggest that Coles has added a new convenient way to speed up the checkout process for people. Whereas Woolworths has aimed to replace people with a computer.

Two companies providing a very similar physical device, but with a very different outcome for customers.

Technology needs to have that extra bit of thought so that it not just new technology but is a useful solution, and there is a very thin line between the two.

Google v Scroogle

Friday, January 21st, 2011

Google in Australia has already taken proceedings against other companies allegedly infringing its trademark, such as Groggle (Groggle is now named Drinkle and the proceedings have settled).

Now Google has a new ‘infringer’ in its sites, a family owned company called Scoogle.  The name Scoogle comes from a modification to the family name of Scougal, and sells eyewear ie: nothing to do with Google’s own business.

A source close to Scoogle says that Google is “…just bullying the modified version of the Scoogle family name”.

Google itself hasn’t yet commented – watch this space!

The full Sydney Morning Herald article is here.